| Agile Planning Advanced Session |
|
Description:
Who Should Attend:
Instructor:
Prior to the session, attendees will receive a detailed background packet on the problem domain used for the session -- just as if they were starting work on an initiative at their own workplace. While the domain will be familiar to all attendees, it does not consist of "toy problems," and participants should be prepared to use the skills they depend on in their professions. The work product produced by the end of the session will be an actual Agile project plan, robust enough to start a sprint or iteration, yet flexible enough to avoid the problems associated with Big Design Up Front. The experience which participants will take away from creating this plan will foster deep skills which they can apply to their unique work situations.
Course Goals:
As a take-away, attendees will have access their Agile plan, loaded in a read-to-go status tracking spreadsheet after the session. The tool aids in tracking user stories & tasks, as well as generating the infamous Burn-down and Burn-up charts. This tangible product of the session will continue to serve as a personalized example of good Agile planning as participants apply this experience back to their jobs. |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
| Seminars Details |
|
We offer seminars and executive briefings on agile software development. These are content filled seminars and are the pedigrees of the same high quality seminars we deliver at conferences nationwide.
Formats Delivery Mechanisms If this is delivered presented to a large audience (50+) then it would be classic presentation with light Q&A encouraged throughout. Our preference is to break this up into small group discussions (5-7 at a table) and then shift back to larger group summary. This format allows participants to personalize the information presented with a stronger feeling of value. One presenter can orchestrate this well only for groups less than 45. Ideal, would be to add a co-presenter for delivery. Then we would demonstrate agile behaviors through an interactive dialog and we could handle a larger number of people with small group discussion break out and large group summary (60-70 folks with small group discussions and large group sumamry). Groups larger than 70+ would be done via a lively interactive dialog with the two presenters and light Q&A from the audience. |